Deciphering diversity at er loci for diversification of powdery mildew resistance in pea

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 16037 (2022) Cite this article

836 Accesses

1 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

An Author Correction to this article was published on 06 December 2022

This article has been updated

Agricultural biotechnology aims to scrutinize the field crops which feed half of the world's population by improving their agronomic traits using various biotechnological tools. Pea- an important cash crop, rich in nutrients, but frequently infected with powdery mildew (fungal disease caused by Erysiphe pisi) that destroys the whole crop and causes economic loss for growers. We, therefore, targeted this research to find the pathogen-resistant pea lines and further decipher the diversity at er locus among resistant pea lines. Screening for resistant pea lines was done with Erysiphe pisi isolates (Genebank submission: KX455922.1) under the net house and greenhouse conditions. Molecular studies revealed that the Erysiphe resistant (er1) gene was present in 40 lines out of selected 50 pea lines and the mutational character was conferred up to 36 genotypes with 11 haplotype groups. The haplotype (gene) diversity (Hd) was found to be 0.5571 ± 0.099 SD and the nucleotide diversity (Pi) was 0.0160 ± 0.0042 SD Majority of resistant lines (67%) occurred in Hap-1, other remaining haplotypes (Hap 2–10) having 33% resistant lines, each showing characteristic nucleotide substitutions with respect to reference PsMLO1 gene; genotypes from these divergent haplotypes can be used in pea resistance breeding to avoid genetic homogeneity and genetic vulnerability.

During this global pandemic era, we are able to precise that the medical facilities become the priority for the life savior of the whole community. Although this is a universal talk, to feed the whole community, agriculture plays an equal and important role in the well-being and livelihood of the people globally. Peeping back into history to till this pandemic situation, we can elaborate on the role of various agricultural and horticultural crops to boost immunity against various diseases e.g. Turmeric, ajwain, ginger, garlic, among vegetables broccoli (anticancerous), lemon (vit c), and all green leafy vegetables (rich in iron). The crops are not only known for their nutritive value; but also provide economy to farmers. These crops are grown in the whole world according to their geographical and climatic conditions. If we start our journey from North-west Himalayas, we pay attention to the Pea crop (Pisum sativum) which has been grown for many centuries for green pods and grains to meet the nutritional demands and economic upliftment of the growers. Nutritionally, the pea crop comprises protein (25%), slowly digestive starch (50%), sugars (12%), amino acids, carbohydrates, vitamins (A and C), calcium and phosphorus1 along with lysine2. An interesting feature of this crop which increases its value as being a vegetable crop, it can be canned, frozen, dehydrated or dried and thus becomes a pulse crop. Being monumental, several preventive measures have been taken for crop protection which occurred due to biotic and abiotic stresses. Powdery mildew of pea is one of the common biotic stresses, which is caused by the Erysiphe pisi DC ex. Saint-Amans reduces the crop yield by up to 50 per cent by affecting the quality and quantity of green pods and dry seeds of pea3,4. Management of this drastic disease becomes a compulsion because the pathogen not only affected the grain and pods but also reduced pea foliage up to 33–69 per cent5. Banyal et al.6 developed disease-resistant cultivars by studying the pathogenic variability of E. pisi among various pea varieties. These resistant lines have er (Erysiphe resistant) locus having MLO gene (responsible for resistant mechanism in pea) which was detected using various molecular approaches. The present investigation, therefore, was carried out to find the presence of MLO gene among selected resistant cultivars of pea and decipher the diversity of er gene present among these resistant cultivars.

Morphological characteristics viz., hyphae, conidia, conidiophores, conidia size and conidiophore foot cells were studied on the detached leaves of the host using a stereo zoom microscope (Fig. 1; Table 1). Attanayake et al.7 described two groups of powdery mildew-infected pea pathogens in a combination of morphological and molecular characteristics. PCR amplification revealed an amplicon of approximately ~ 560 bp, (Fig. 2) which was further gel purified and lyophilized before sequencing. BLAST analysis of the sequences of test isolates P-1 (from pea) and P-2 (from clover) indicated that both the strains were placed in the phylogenetic lineage occupied by the genus Erysiphe along with species, pisi and trifolii, respectively (Fig. 2) (https://v3.boldsystems.org/index.php/IDS_BlastRequest). The 18S rRNA sequence strain has been deposited in the NCBI GeneBank (Accession numbers KX455922 and KX455923, respectively).

Cleistothecia of Erysiphe pisi causing pea powdery mildew are formed during sexual reproduction, appeared as spherical, gregarious, dark brown color, measuring about 87.5–133 µm in diameter and dispersed in the mycelial web.

rDNA region amplified using Erysiphe specific primers-EryF(5’-TACAGAGTGCGAGGCTCAGTCG-3’) EryR (5’-GGTCAACCTGTGATCCATGTGACTGG-3’) (M: 1 Kb ladder; fungal isolates (P1-P24 UPPER) P-1 and P-2 along with tree phylogeny of P-1: Erysiphe pisi, P-2: Erysiphe trifolii (LOWER).

Previously, screening was done, and selected 3 resistant lines were crossed with JI-2302 (er1) and JI-2480 (er2) in 8 cross combinations viz., JI-2480 × Acacia, JI-2480 × PMR-10, JI-2480 × EC-381866–1, JI-2480 × Lincoln, JI-2302 × Acacia, JI-2302 × PMR-10, JI-2302 × EC-381866–1 and JI-2302 × Lincoln under net-house and greenhouse and description of infection were observed6. Resistant was governed in maximum cultivars due to the presence of the er1 gene (Table 2). We, therefore, select the er1 gene for further studies.

A total of 50 pea lines were used for RNA extraction (Fig. 3). cDNA prepared from RNA was further amplified by specific primers mentioned in the material and methods. To achieve this many times repeated PCRs were carried out in all the samples to standardize the protocol. Out of 50 lines, amplification was possible with primer 3F and 3R which produced 40 amplicons of variable size (300–325 bp) targeting that the er1 gene was present only in these lines. (Table 3; Fig. 3).

Amplification of DNA fragments (1–40) of selected pea lines. Amplification was possible with primer Primer PsMLO3F and PsMLO3R produced 40 amplicons of variable size (300–325 bp) in different genotypes used. L = Ladder (100 bp).

BLAST N search for the homology of all the sequences of er1 gene corresponds to the gene present in Pisum sativum MLO1 (MLO1) mRNA, complete cds; homology queries values ≥ 90% and E values near 0 for Nucleotide Blast analysis. Phylogenetic analyses separated the pea accessions into 3 groups. The major group A constituted 32 accessions and the remaining 8 accessions were grouped as 6 and 2 in the B and C groups, respectively. The obtained tree was then saved to Newick format and the Fig Tree program was used for tree illustration (Fig. 4) (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

NJ tree based on MLO sequences. Posterior probabilities of the main clades above 0.93 (a) and bootstrap values in % (b) are indicated at the nodes (100). The designation includes pea lines number and name.

A total of 11 haplotypes were obtained and the frequency of haplotypes ranged from 1 to 24. Hap-1 was the most abundant haplotype representing 24 genotypes including the reference genotype (FJ463618.1). The remaining haplotypes were represented by a single genotype except Hap- 4 which is represented by 3 genotypes (Table 4). The Hap-1 having 23 genotypes showed 100 per cent similarity with reference genotype (FJ463618.1), hence does not have any base substitution w.r.t PsMLO1, whereas, Hap-2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 have 9, 5, 1, 6, 6, 16, 15, 14, 13 and 6 base substitutions, respectively.

The analysis of polymorphic sites was carried out using DNAsp VI and a total of 36 sequences were used with a total of 198 variable sites. The 47 polymorphic sites included 18 Singleton variable sites, out of which 17 were with two variants and one was with three variants. There were 29 Parsimony informative sites out of which 26 were with two variants and three with three variants. The analysis of polymorphic sites was further studied in detail using multiple sequence alignment. Multiple sequence alignment was carried out in MEGA-(software) using the tool Clustal W8. Each haplotype of evaluated resistant pea genotypes was compared with the reference genotype for any site with replacement, deletion and addition (Fig. 5).

Sequence alignment of MLO gene (906–1229 bp) of powdery mildew resistant pea accessions belonging to Haplotype 1–11 with reference sequence FJ463618.1.

Haplotype diversity was calculated using DNAsp VI where haplotype (gene) diversity was 0.5571 and Nucleotide diversity (per site) of 0.01606 (Table 5). Tajima's test was also found to be statistically significant with Tajima's D-2.09021 at P < 0.05. A median-joining network inferred from 40 sets of sequences with 33 no. of active haplotypes was drawn. A value of zero was set for epsilon (e = 0) to calculate sparse networks quickly, or incrementally. The maximum no. of mutations (29) was found at character 941 and the least no. of mutations (1) were ranged at characters 992–1190 (Fig. 6).

Median joining network with median vector (red color dots), mutated characters (red color taxa) and sequence frequency (yellow color dots).

Pulses are majorly produced crops after cereals and field pea (Pisum sativum) is one of the widely cultivated crops9. To date, various research studies have been carried out for the management of powdery mildew in pea plants10,11,12. For long-term management and increase in yield production, it is required to develop genetically resistant crop plants13. Furthermore, the knowledge of germplasm resources and yield contributing characters are necessary to understand genetic diversity14. Knowing the importance of this vegetable crop by exploring the literature we, therefore, continued our investigation by determining the diversity in pathogen-resistant pea lines at er loci15, which were screened in vitro16. Collection and DNA profiling of powdery mildew causing pea pathogen17,18 corresponds to genus Erysiphe with species, pisi and trifoli, respectively7,19,20. The North-Western Himalayan region is the most prevalent hot spot of powdery mildew16. The sexual stage of a pathogen (cleistothecia) is frequently formed only in the dry temperate zone21 indicating the presence of the pathogenic virulence of E. pisi in Zone IV of the Himalayas. The study of pathogenic variability of E. pisi is the most important for breeding resistant varieties. The resistant varieties evolved against pea powdery mildew and become susceptible after a short time, indicating the existence and selection for the emergence of new E. pisi virulence. The study of pathogenic variability has therefore been required for the successful management of the disease through the identification, development, and deployment of resistance sources/varieties in a given geographic situation6,22. This could be helpful for us to a greater extent regarding breeding as well as in conservation aspects of the pea crop improvement program. Experimental results revealed that the screened cultivars (having Erysiphe pisi resistant gene) when crossed with carriers (JI-2302, JI-2480 (er1 and er2) found to be governed by resistance by a single er1 gene from the resistant carrier line JI-2302 (er1)12,23,24,25,26. Genes er1 and er 2 can be considered as major natural resistant bases10,27,28,29 against powdery mildew pathogen, thus introgressed into subsequent pea lines. Although er2 gene which also conferred resistance, the maximum pea cultivars revealed the presence of er1 gene conferring resistance against powdery mildew12,25,26. The er1 gene obtained in resistant pea lines was further ensured using a molecular approach30,31,32,33. Past discoveries brought us the knowledge of naturally occurring random mutagenesis at Mildew Locus O (MLO) in many monocots/dicots34 which led to natural loss-of-function mutations. Reports suggest this mutation becomes beneficial for the host to terminate the fungal invasion at the first step, thus creating resistance. In the case of Pisum sativum, the PsMLO1 gene present in the crop provides a broad and durable resistance against the powdery mildew pathogen35, thus acting like a candidate gene to reveal the allelic diversity among resistant pea lines. Amplification with primers (PsMLO3FP and PsMLO3R) revealed that the candidates can be identified during the early stages of E. pisi infection36. In the cases of tomato37, barley38, pepper39 and grapevine40,41, resistant gene expression increased in response to the pathogen within the first 24 h and a peak of resistance was obtained around 6 h. Similarly, after infection of E. pisi, the resistance developed in pea lines after 4–8 days, which was observed morphologically, and resistant and susceptible rates were recorded42. During phylogenetic analysis, we found most of the er1 gene sequences corresponded to the reference gene (Pisum sativum MLO1) of which the largest clade comprises of major group A corresponds to ≥ 90% of similarity with Pisum sativum MLO1 sequences43,44. The results were found to be in harmony with the results obtained by many collaborators35,37. Accession of pea lines in a major clade of group A (Fig. 4) having the MLO1 sequences (analog of er-1 gene) can thus be used directly in future breeding programs. According to NIH (National Human Genome Research), haplotypes are allelic combinations (single /multiple) where the polymorphism found very close in between the genes thus inherited together without any recombination, subsequently used in genetic studies. Haplotype based approach used for identification of genetic divesity in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars had been extensively used by many scientists45 thus become a useful technique in crop improvement programmes. We found a total of 11 haplotype groups where the frequency of haplotypes ranged from 1 to 24. Among these groups, Hap-1 was the most abundant haplotype, representing 23 genotypes, including the reference genotype (FJ463618.1), which revealed no base substitution w.r.t PsMLO1. The genotypes having the er1 gene grouped in Hap-1 represent the resistant alleles passed from resistant carriers linked together without any substitutions. In the case of Hap-2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, we found base substitutions of 9, 5, 1, 6, 6, 16, 15, 14, 13 and 6, respectively at the MLO locus, showing the diversity in the er1 gene substitutions (Fig. 5). Each haplotype of evaluated resistant pea genotypes was compared with the reference genotype for any site with replacement, deletion and addition. The genotypes from these divergent haplotypes can be used in pea resistance breeding to avoid genetic homogeneity and genetic vulnerability. In case of the fruit crop divergent cultivars can be used for domestication of early and late maturing cultivars in lychee46. Statistical calculations revealed the haplotype diversity of 0.5571 ± 0.099 SD and nucleotide diversity (Pi) of 0.0160 ± 0.0042 SD. A low value of nd (0.01606) and a negative value of Tajima's D -2.09021 at P < 0.05 (statistically significant) revealed that these resistant lines can't be affected by environmental conditions. Nucleotide diversty (nd) of the cultivated varieties of Korean rice accessions (weedy = 0.0102, landrace = 0.0093, and bred = 0.0066) was found to be lower, revealed no reduction in diversity during domestication47. To illustrate the molecular data for intraspecific studies, various haplotype networks were previously used 48. In simple terms, these networks provide insight into the population structure, migration and new species creation49. Here, we draw a median-joining network (MJN) of haplotypes with mutated characters (Fig. 6). Literature supported that the MJ method required the least no. of mutations, which yielded a good genealogy50. Also, this MJ approach functioned properly when haplotypes were comparatively distant51 and displayed a good network construction under low substitution rates52. Kong et al.53 discussed the use of median-joining networks in the field of evolutionary biology. Our MJN network revealed the presence of the er1 gene in the great majority of lines that shared an identical haplotype with the reference PSMLO1 gene, thereby suggesting that these lines have originated from a common ancestor.

All the materials collected and the methodology designed for the research was in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

A total of 24 isolates of pathogen-causing powdery mildew were collected from North-west Himalayas out of which maximum isolates were collected from 15 different locations in the trans-Himalayan Lahul Spiti region. These were purified and maintained in a greenhouse for further studies. The pathogen causing pea powdery mildew was identified on the basis of morphological characteristics viz., hyphae, conidia, conidiophores, conidia size and conidiophore foot cells. Further, polyphasic analysis of strain was done Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The sequence obtained was submitted to the NCBI gene bank for accession number.

Screening for resistance against identified fungal pathogen was done from a panel of 310 pea lines comprising exotic and indigenous germplasm collected from different sources (CSK HPKV Palampur, NBPGR New Delhi, PAU Ludhiana and IIPR Kanpur) were evaluated in net-house as well as on detached leaves under in vitro conditions54. The identified resistant lines along with susceptible ones were crossed with known recessive genes er1 and er2 present in JI-2302 (er1) and JI-2480 (er2) lines under greenhouse. Further, cultivars having resistance to respective er genes were selected to determine the allelic diversity at er locus.

A total of 50 pea lines were selected for RNA isolation using the trizol method55. RNA was extracted from fresh leaves (without inoculation of Erysiphe pisi) and inoculated leaves after 4 and 8 days of fungal (Erysiphe pisi) inoculation.

40 ug of RNA was used for cDNA amplification using reverse transcriptase enhancer, 5 × cDNA buffer, dNTP mix (5 Mm each), and verso enzyme as per the instructions recommended on the Verso enzyme cDNA kit. PCR reaction mix was incubated at 42 °C for 30 min. Further, the reaction was terminated at 95 °C for 2 min. For amplification of cDNA, PCR plates were filled with a reaction mixture containing 5Xbuffer, 25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM of each specific-designed PsMLO primer (Table 6), 5U Taq DNA polymerase with template cDNA. Amplification profile consisted of 1 cycle at 95 °C/5 min; 37cycles at 95 °C/30 s, 50 °C/the 30 s and 72 °C/1 min 20 s; 1 cycle at 72 °C/7 min; hold at 4 °C/∞. The PCR products were separated on agarose gel (1.2%) and the targeted amplicons were purified and sequenced at the SciGenome Labs Private Ltd. Cochin, Kerala—INDIA.

The homology of gene sequences was analyzed using online bioinformatics tools available in the NCBI database in the FASTA program. BLASTN was used for sequence comparison on NCBI genomic database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA 5.056 and genetic parameters such as haplotype diversity and total number of mutations, Indel polymorphism were calculated using DnaSP version 5.1057. Network v 4.61 was used to construct a Median-joining (MJ)58 network of the haplotypes (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com).

For the management of fungal diseases in crops, many strategies including conventional as well as non-conventional approaches are frequently used. From our research, we identified the resistant cultivars in pea crops that meet the demand of low and marginal farmers and reduce the use of chemicals in a controlled manner.

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the NCBI Nucleotide repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1131300078, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1131300079 with accession numbers GenBank: KX455922.1 and GenBank: KX455923.1 respectively.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25312-0

Smýkal, P. et al. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era. Agronomy 2, 74–115 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Avci, M. A. & Ceyhan, E. Correlations and genetic analysis of pod characteristics in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. 5, 1–4 (2006).

Google Scholar

Dixon, G. R. Powdery mildew of vegetables and allied crops. In Powdery Mildew (ed. Speaure, D. M.) (Academic Press, 1987).

Google Scholar

Nisar, M., Ghafoor, A., Khan, M. R. & Qureshi, A. S. Screening of Pisum sativum L. germplasm against Erysiphe pisi Syd. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 48, 33–37 (2006).

Google Scholar

Suneetha, T., Gopinath, S. M. & Naik, S. L. Identification of resistance gene analogs (RGAs) linked to powdery mildew resistance in Peas. Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng. 6, 33–36 (2014).

Google Scholar

Banyal, D. K., Singh, A. & Tyagi, P. Pathogenic variability in Erysiphe pisi causing powdery mildew of pea. Himachal J. Agric. Res 31, 87–92 (2005).

Google Scholar

Attanayake, R. N., Glawe, D. A., McPhee, K. E., Dugan, F. M. & Chen, W. Erysiphe trifolii—A newly recognized powdery mildew pathogen of pea. Plant Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shahid, M., Ahmed, B., Zaidi, A. & Khan, M. S. Toxicity of fungicides to: Pisum sativum: A study of oxidative damage, growth suppression, cellular death and morpho-anatomical changes. RSC Adv. 8, 38483–38498 (2018).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Heringa, K. J., Vannorel, A. & Tazelaar, M. F. Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni DC) in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Euphy 13, 163–169 (1969).

Article Google Scholar

Gupta, S. K. & Thind, T. S. Disease Problems in Vegetable Production 342–342 (Kalyani Publishers, 2006).

Google Scholar

Tiwari, K. R., Penner, G. A. & Warkentin, T. D. Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77, 307–310 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Nigussie, T., Seid, A., Derje, G., Tesfaye, B., Chemeda, F., Adane, A., Abiy, T., Fekede, A. & Kiros, M. Review of research on diseases food legumes. Abraham Tadesse (Eds). Increasing crop production through improved plant protection. (1): 85–124. (2008)

Rahman, M. M., Syed, M., Akter, A., Alam, M. M. & Ahsan, M. M. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis of morphological traits in transplanted aman rice (Oryza sativa L.). Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 14(5), 387–391 (2014).

Google Scholar

Chaudhary, J. & Banyal, D. K. Evaluation of pea genotypes for resistance against powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe pisi. Ind. Phytopathol. 70, 69–74 (2017).

Google Scholar

Rana, J. C. et al. Screening of pea germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew. Euphytica 189, 271–282 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Banyal, D. K. & Rana, S. K. Fungicidal spray schedule for the management of pea powdery mildew. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 33, 302–304 (2003).

Google Scholar

Takamatsu, S., Ito, H., Shiroya, Y., Kiss, L. & Heluta, V. First comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the genus Erysiphe (Erysiphales, Erysiphaceae) I. The Microsphaera lineage. Mycologia 107, 475–489 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kiss, L. Advances in the identification of emerging powdery mildew fungi using morphological and molecular data. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 49, 245–248 (2002).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Baiswar, P. et al. Molecular evidence of Erysiphe pisi on pea and E. trifoliorum on white clover in northeast India. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 10, 1–3 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Kapoor, A. S. & Chaudhary, H. K. Mode of the perpetuation of Erysiphe pisi in dry temperate zones of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Phytopathol. 48, 77–78 (1995).

Google Scholar

Pal, A. B., Brahmapp, Rawal, R. D. & Ullasa, B. A. Field resistance of pea germplasm to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) and rust (Uromyces fabae). Plant Dis. 64, 1085 (1980).

Article Google Scholar

Fondevilla, S., Carver, T. L. W., Moreno, M. T. & Rubiales, D. Identification and characterization of sources of resistance to Erysiphe pisi Syd. in Pisum spp. Plant Breed. 126, 113–119 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Fondevilla, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Khare, N. & Rubiales, D. Erysiphe trifolii is able to overcome er1 and Er3, but not er2, resistance genes in pea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 136, 557–563 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sun, S. et al. Resistance to powdery mildew in the pea cultivar Xucai 1 is conferred by the gene er1. Crop J. 3, 489–499 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Sun, S. et al. A novel er1 allele and the development and validation of its functional marker for breeding pea (Pisum sativum L.) resistance to powdery mildew. Theor. Appl. Genet. 129, 909–919 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Fondevilla, S., Rubiales, D., Moreno, M. T. & Torres, A. M. Identification and validation of RAPD and SCAR markers linked to the gene Er3 conferring resistance to Erysiphe pisi DC in pea. Mol. Breed. 22, 193–200 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Fondevilla, S., Carver, T. L. W., Moreno, M. T. & Rubiales, D. Macroscopic and histological characterization of genes er1 and er2 for powdery mildew resistance in pea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 115, 309–321 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Harland, S. C. Inheritance of immunity to mildew in Peruvian forms of Pisum sativum. Heredity 2, 263–269 (1948).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kumar, H. & Singh, R. B. Genetic analysis of adult plant resistance to powdery mildew in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 30, 147–151 (1981).

Article Google Scholar

Vaid, A. & Tyagi, P. D. Genetics of powdery mildew resistance in pea. Euphytica 96, 203–206 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Zeng, L., Li, M. Q. & Yang, X. M. Identification of resistance of peas resources to powdery mildew. Grass. Turf 32, 35–38 (2012).

Google Scholar

Wang, Z. Y. et al. Identification of powdery mildew resistance gene in pea line X9002. Acta Agron. Sin. (China) 41, 515 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jørgensen, I. H. Discovery, characterization and exploitation of MLO powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63, 141–152 (1992).

Article Google Scholar

Humphry, M., Reinstädler, A., Ivanov, S., Bisseling, T. & Panstruga, R. Durable broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in pea er1 plants is conferred by natural loss-of-function mutations in PsMLO1. Mol. Plant Pathol. 12, 866–878 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sun, S. et al. Two novel er1 alleles conferring powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) resistance identified in a worldwide collection of pea (Pisum sativum L.) germplasms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5071 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bai, Y. L. et al. Naturally occurring broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in a central American tomato accession is caused by loss of Mlo function. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 30–39 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Piffanelli, P. et al. The barley MLO modulator of defense and cell death is responsive to biotic and abiotic stress stimuli. Plant Physiol. 129, 1076–1085 (2002).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zheng, Z. et al. Loss of function in MLO orthologs reduces susceptibility of pepper and tomato to powdery mildew disease caused by Leveillula taurica. PLoS ONE 8, e70723 (2013).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Feechan, A., Jermakow, A. M., Torregrosa, L., Panstruga, R. & Dry, I. B. Identification of grapevine MLO gene candidates involved in susceptibility to powdery mildew. Funct. Plant Biol. 35, 1255 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Winterhagen, P., Howard, S. F., Qiu, W. & Kovacs, L. Transcriptional up-regulation of grapevine MLO genes in response to powdery mildew infection. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 59, 159–168 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Büschges, R. et al. The barley Mlo gene: A novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88, 695–705 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Filiz, E. & Vatansever, R. Genome-wide identification of mildew resistance locus O (MLO) genes in tree model poplar (Populus trichocarpa): Powdery mildew management in woody plants. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 152, 95–109 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Kusch, S., Pesch, L. & Panstruga, R. Comprehensive phylogenetic analysis sheds light on the diversity and origin of the MLO family of integral membrane proteins. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 878–895 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Brinton, J. et al. A haplotype-led approach to increase the precision of wheat breeding. Commun. Biol. 3, 712 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hu, G. et al. Two divergent haplotypes from a highly heterozygous lychee genome suggest independent domestication events for early and late-maturing cultivars. Nat. Genet. 54, 73–83 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Maung, T. Z., Chu, S. H. & Park, Y. J. Functional haplotypes and evolutionary insight into the granule-bound starch synthase II (GBSSII) gene in Korean rice accessions (KRICE_CORE). Foods 10, 2359 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Garcia, E. et al. Haplotype network branch diversity, a new metric combining genetic and topological diversity to compare the complexity of haplotype networks. PLoS ONE 16, e0251878 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mendez-Harclerode, F. M. et al. Molecular evidence for high levels of intrapopulation genetic diversity in woodrats (Neotoma Micropus). J. Mammal. 88, 360–370 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Cassens, I. et al. The phylogeography of dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscrus): A critical examination of network methods and rooting procedures. Mol. Ecol. 12, 1781–1792 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cassens, I., Mardulyn, P. & Milinkovich, M. C. Evaluating intraspecific "network" construction methods using simulated sequence data: Do existing algorithms outperform the Global Maximum Parsimony approach?. Syst. Biol. 54, 363–372 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Wooley, S. M., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. A comparison of phylogenetic network methods using computer simulation. PLoS ONE 3, e1913 (2008).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Kong, S., Sánchez-Pacheco, S. & Murphy, R. On the use of median-joining networks in evolutionary biology. Cladistics. 32, 691–699 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Banyal, D. K., Singh, A., Upmanyu, S., Chaudhary, J. & Sharma, P. N. Diversity analysis of Erysiphe pisi populations causing pea powdery mildew in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Phytopathol. 67, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.83 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chomczynski, P. & Sacchi, N. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: Twenty-something years on. Nat. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P. & Röhl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02306.x (1999).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

The authors are thankful to funding agency SERB, Ministry of Science and Technology Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi for providing financial assistance during the entire period for completion of the research.

Department of Plant Pathology, COA, CSKHPKV, Palampur, HP, 176061, India

Devinder K. Banyal, Himisha Dixit, Anudeep B. Malannavar & Nisha Thakur

Dr YSPUHF, KVK, Chamba, HP, 17512, India

Jaya Chaudhary

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

All authors did each step of research equally under the supervision of D.K.B. (Professor and Head, COA, Deptt of plant pathology, CSKHPKV, Palampur (H.P). The corresponding author completed the research and wrote the full manuscript which was viewed by all the authors.

Correspondence to Nisha Thakur.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this Article was revised: In the original version of this Article, Himisha Dixit was incorrectly affiliated with ‘Centre forComputational Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, TAB Shahpur, Kangra, HP, 176206, India’. The correctaffiliation is listed here. Department of Plant Pathology, COA, CSKHPKV, Palampur, HP, 176061, India.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Banyal, D.K., Dixit, H., Chaudhary, J. et al. Deciphering diversity at er loci for diversification of powdery mildew resistance in pea. Sci Rep 12, 16037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19894-y

Download citation

Received: 07 January 2022

Accepted: 06 September 2022

Published: 26 September 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19894-y

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.